AI agents now retrieve data, call tools, execute workflows, and take real actions. AISecOps provides the runtime governance layer for controlling and investigating those systems: provenance-aware replay, capability-gated execution, execution graphs, deterministic execution boundaries, structured audit logging, and replayable runtime forensics.
Enterprises are deploying AI agents that browse the web, read email, query databases, and execute code. Traditional application security was not designed for autonomous execution systems.
Your AI agent calls a tool. You see a log entry. There's no policy engine — the call either succeeds or fails at the API level. You have no visibility into what the model was instructed to do, why it chose that tool, or whether the retrieved context was clean.
Every execution plan passes through a runtime control plane. Retrieved context is sanitized before the model sees it. Capability gates validate requested actions before policy evaluation. Every runtime decision emits a structured audit event. Replayable JSONL logs enable explainability, forensics, and governance.
Indirect prompt injection via RAG. Tool parameter manipulation. Memory context poisoning. Policy drift as models and prompts evolve. These are not theoretical — they have been demonstrated in production agentic systems.
A layered runtime governance architecture: local enforcement, context validation, capability containment, execution governance, deterministic execution boundaries, and replayable observability. Open-source reference implementations. Enterprise adoption guidance. Threat models aligned to OWASP LLM risks.
AISecOps governs the runtime path from untrusted input to execution and replay: local guards, capability gates, deterministic execution boundaries, structured audit, and forensic reconstruction.
Optional local / edge guards stop obvious injection patterns before cloud model invocation. Validate and sanitize all external data before it enters the model's context window. Treat every retrieved document, memory chunk, and tool response as untrusted input that must be inspected for injection patterns.
Enforce capability-gated execution and parameter validation before any external call is executed. The policy engine — not the model — decides what actions are permitted. Deny by default.
Separate planning, evaluation, and execution into distinct runtime boundaries. Deterministic executors run only approved or allowed execution plans. High-risk actions require approval workflows and emit explainable audit trails.
Emit structured JSONL runtime events at every decision point. Support replay, explainability, forensic reconstruction, governance analytics, and policy drift analysis across deployments.
AISecOps reconstructs execution history from structured runtime events: execution plans, policy evaluations, provenance chains, approval flows, execution paths, and final governance outcomes.
Replay summaries expose runtime decisions, provenance trust levels, event counts, and execution outcomes for forensic investigation.
Structured replay timelines reconstruct planning, evaluation, approval, execution, and final governance decisions in execution order.
Execution graphs reconstruct causal runtime relationships between provenance sources, planning stages, policy evaluation, approvals, tool execution, and final outcomes.
A deep dive into AISecOps Interceptor, runtime governance, provenance-aware replay, execution graphs, and why AI agents need forensic investigation layers once they start taking actions.
Read on Medium →
Framework documentation, threat models, reference architecture, and working open-source code. No account required.
The disambiguation page — how AISecOps for agentic AI differs from legacy "AI for SecOps" definitions.
Read the definition →MCP, A2A, swarm systems — a structured threat model covering all major agentic AI attack vectors with OWASP LLM mapping.
View threat model →A runtime control plane blueprint: local enforcement, capability gates, execution governance, deterministic execution boundaries, and replayable audit architecture.
View architecture →Runtime investigation workflows for provenance-aware replay, timeline reconstruction, execution graph analysis, and forensic review of AI agent decisions.
View runtime forensics →Framework document covering AISecOps foundations, runtime control planes, execution splitting, capability-gated execution, and enterprise adoption guidance.
Download →Reference implementation with replay APIs, Replay Audit UI, provenance-aware runtime events, capability-gated execution, and execution graph investigation.
View on GitHub →